A major political controversy has broken out after the Central government directed mobile phone manufacturers to pre install the Sanchar Saathi mobile application on all smartphones manufactured or imported into India. The move has sparked sharp reactions from Opposition parties, who argue that the directive threatens citizens’ privacy and opens the door to state surveillance. The government, however, maintains that the initiative is purely aimed at protecting users from cyber fraud, spam, and mobile phone theft.
The debate has now moved beyond technology policy into constitutional territory, with privacy, consent, and individual freedom becoming central themes of the growing political row.
What Is Sanchar Saathi
Sanchar Saathi is a digital public safety initiative launched by the Central government to enhance telecom security and protect citizens from various forms of cyber related misuse. The platform is available through a mobile app as well as a dedicated web portal.
One of its most prominent features is Chakshu, a reporting mechanism that allows citizens to flag suspected cyber fraud attempts. This includes fraudulent phone calls, phishing links, spam messages, and suspicious communications received through SMS, rich communication services, iMessage, and popular messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram.
According to information available on the official Sanchar Saathi portal, user reports help the Department of Telecommunications take timely action to prevent misuse of telecom resources for financial fraud, identity theft, and other cyber crimes.
Key Summary at a Glance
Category |
Details |
|---|---|
App Name |
Sanchar Saathi |
Issuing Authority |
Department of Telecommunications |
Implementation Start |
November 28 |
Mandatory For |
All phones made or imported in India |
Compliance Timeline |
Within 90 days |
Government Objective |
Fight cyber fraud and recover stolen phones |
Opposition Concern |
Privacy and surveillance |
Official Website |
Services Offered Through the App
The Sanchar Saathi ecosystem offers multiple citizen focused services. Users can report commercial spam calls, fraudulent websites, and malware delivery attempts. The app also supports reporting of SIM cloning and unauthorized mobile connections.
In addition, the platform allows users to block lost or stolen phones and later facilitate their recovery. The government states that this feature has already had a measurable impact, helping law enforcement track and disable misused devices.
What the Centre Has Directed Phone Manufacturers to Do
The directive has been issued by the Department of Telecommunications, which functions under the Ministry of Communications headed by Jyotiraditya Scindia.
Under the new order, all mobile phone manufacturers must ensure that the Sanchar Saathi app is pre installed on every handset that is manufactured or imported into India. This requirement applies to both domestically produced and overseas manufactured devices.
Manufacturers have been given a window of 90 days from November 28 to comply with the instruction. The app must be clearly visible and easily accessible to users during the first device setup. The government has explicitly instructed that the app’s functions should not be disabled or restricted in any manner.
For devices that have already been manufactured, companies have been directed to push the Sanchar Saathi app through a software update.
Warning Issued Over Non Compliance
The Department of Telecommunications has warned that failure to implement the directive may attract regulatory action. While the nature of enforcement has not been publicly detailed, the language of the notification signals that compliance is mandatory rather than optional.
This has raised concerns across the technology sector about regulatory overreach and the lack of prior consultation with phone manufacturers.
Opposition Raises Privacy and Constitutional Concerns
The directive has been met with strong criticism from the Opposition, particularly the Indian National Congress. Senior Congress leader K C Venugopal described the move as unconstitutional and warned against unchecked state monitoring.
He argued that the Right to Privacy forms an intrinsic part of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. According to him, a government mandated application that comes pre loaded on personal devices risks monitoring the daily lives, communications, and decisions of citizens without explicit consent.
Congress has demanded an immediate rollback of the directive.
Wider Opposition Pushback
The criticism has not been limited to one party. Priyanka Chaturvedi, a Rajya Sabha MP from Shiv Sena UBT, also criticized the move, calling it a worrying step towards invasive digital surveillance.
She stated that instead of strengthening grievance redressal mechanisms to combat cyber fraud, the government appears to be opting for intrusive solutions that potentially compromise user privacy. She warned that such measures will face widespread political and public resistance.
Industry Concerns and Global Tech Implications
The government’s mandate may also lead to friction with global smartphone manufacturers. According to reports quoting industry sources, companies were not consulted before issuing the directive.
Technology giants such as Apple have historically opposed pre installation mandates for government applications, citing privacy and security reasons. While Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi have not publicly commented on the current directive, industry insiders suggest that discussions behind the scenes could become contentious.
Global manufacturers often operate under strict privacy frameworks, particularly for devices sold across multiple markets, making compliance with country specific software mandates more complex.
Data Shared by the Government on App Usage
The government has defended its stance by highlighting the tangible outcomes already achieved through Sanchar Saathi. As per data published on the official website, the platform has helped block around 42 lakh stolen mobile phones and facilitated the recovery of approximately 26 lakh devices.
In terms of usage, the Sanchar Saathi app has reportedly crossed over one crore downloads on Android devices and close to ten lakh downloads on iOS.
Officials argue that these figures demonstrate both the effectiveness and public acceptance of the platform.
Larger Debate Around Consent and Digital Rights
The controversy has reignited a broader debate around digital consent in India. Critics argue that users should have the freedom to choose which apps are installed on their personal devices, especially when those apps are promoted or mandated by the state.
Supporters of the directive counter that pre installation ensures wider awareness and accessibility, particularly for users who may not actively download safety related apps.
The lack of clarity around whether the app can be uninstalled has further fueled suspicion among privacy advocates.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q. What is Sanchar Saathi used for
A. It helps users report cyber fraud, spam calls, phishing links, and also assists in blocking and recovering stolen mobile phones.
Q. Why is the government mandating its installation
A. The Centre says it aims to strengthen cyber safety and prevent misuse of telecom resources.
Q. Is the Sanchar Saathi app mandatory for all phones
A. Yes, as per the directive, it must be pre installed on all phones made or imported in India.
Q. Why is the Opposition opposing the move
A. Opposition parties fear it may enable state surveillance and violate the Right to Privacy.
Q. Can manufacturers refuse to comply
A. Non compliance may attract regulatory action, though implementation discussions are ongoing.
Conclusion
The Sanchar Saathi directive has emerged as a flashpoint in India’s evolving digital governance landscape. While the government frames it as a necessary tool for public safety and cyber protection, Opposition parties view it as a dangerous precedent with serious implications for personal privacy and constitutional rights.
As phone manufacturers, policymakers, and lawmakers navigate this issue, the outcome may set an important benchmark for how digital security, consent, and state authority intersect in the age of smartphones.
For More Information Click HERE
